A few days ago, the Oba of Lagos threatened Igbo leaders. If they did not vote for his governorship candidate in Lagos, he said, they would be thrown into the lagoon. His entire speech was a flagrant performance of disregard. His words said, in effect: I think so little of you that I don’t have to cajole you but will just threaten you and, by the way, your safety in Lagos is not assured, it is negotiable.
There have been condemnations of the Oba’s words. Sadly, many of the condemnations from non-Igbo people have come with the ugly impatience of expressions like ‘move on,’ and ‘don’t be over-emotional’ and ‘calm down.’ These take away the power, even the sincerity, of the condemnations. It is highhanded and offensive to tell an aggrieved person how to feel, or how quickly to forgive, just as an apology becomes a non-apology when it comes with ‘now get over it.’
Other condemnations of the Oba’s words have been couched in dismissive or diminishing language such as ‘The Oba can’t really do anything, he isn’t actually going to kill anyone. He was joking. He was just being a loudmouth.’
Or – the basest yet – ‘we are all prejudiced.’ It is dishonest to respond to a specific act of prejudice by ignoring that act and instead stressing the generic and the general. It is similar to responding to a specific crime by saying ‘we are all capable of crime.’ Indeed we are. But responses such as these are diversionary tactics. They dismiss the specific act, diminish its importance, and ultimately aim at silencing the legitimate fears of people.
We are indeed all prejudiced, but that is not an appropriate response to an issue this serious. The Oba is not an ordinary citizen. He is a traditional ruler in a part of a country where traditional rulers command considerable influence – the reluctance on the part of many to directly chastise the Oba speaks to his power. The Oba’s words matter. He is not a singular voice; he represents traditional authority. The Oba’s words matter because they are enough to incite violence in a political setting already fraught with uncertainty. The Oba’s words matter even more in the event that Ambode loses the governorship election, because it would then be easy to scapegoat Igbo people and hold them punishable.
Nigerians who consider themselves enlightened might dismiss the Oba’s words as illogical. But the scapegoating of groups – which has a long history all over the world – has never been about logic. The Oba’s words matter because they bring worrying echoes of the early 1960s in Nigeria, when Igbo people were scapegoated for political reasons. Chinua Achebe, when he finally accepted that Lagos, the city he called home, was unsafe for him because he was Igbo, saw crowds at the motor park taunting Igbo people as they boarded buses: ‘Go, Igbo, go so that garri will be cheaper in Lagos!’
Of course Igbo people were not responsible for the cost of garri. But they were perceived as people who were responsible for a coup and who were ‘taking over’ and who, consequently, could be held responsible for everything bad.
Any group of people would understandably be troubled by a threat such as the Oba’s, but the Igbo, because of their history in Nigeria, have been particularly troubled. And it is a recent history. There are people alive today who were publicly attacked in cosmopolitan Lagos in the 1960s because they were Igbo. Even people who were merely light-skinned were at risk of violence in Lagos markets, because to be light-skinned was to be mistaken for Igbo.
Almost every Nigerian ethnic group has a grouse of some sort with the Nigerian state. The Nigerian state has, by turns, been violent, unfair, neglectful, of different parts of the country. Almost every ethnic group has derogatory stereotypes attached to it by other ethnic groups.
But it is disingenuous to suggest that the experience of every ethnic group has been the same. Anti-Igbo violence began under the British colonial government, with complex roots and manifestations. But the end result is a certain psychic difference in the relationship of Igbo people to the Nigerian state. To be Igbo in Nigeria is constantly to be suspect; your national patriotism is never taken as the norm, you are continually expected to prove it.
All groups are conditioned by their specific histories. Perhaps another ethnic group would have reacted with less concern to the Oba’s threat, because that ethnic group would not be conditioned by a history of being targets of violence, as the Igbo have been.
Many responses to the Oba’s threat have mentioned the ‘welcoming’ nature of Lagos, and have made comparisons between Lagos and southeastern towns like Onitsha. It is valid to debate the ethnic diversity of different parts of Nigeria, to compare, for example, Ibadan and Enugu, Ado-Ekiti and Aba, and to debate who moves where, and who feels comfortable living where and why that is. But it is odd to pretend that Lagos is like any other city in Nigeria. It is not. The political history of Lagos and its development as the first national capital set it apart. Lagos is Nigeria’s metropolis. There are ethnic Igbo people whose entire lives have been spent in Lagos, who have little or no ties to the southeast, who speak Yoruba better than Igbo. Should they, too, be reminded to be ‘grateful’ each time an election draws near?
No law-abiding Nigerian should be expected to show gratitude for living peacefully in any part of Nigeria. Landlords in Lagos should not, as still happens too often, be able to refuse to rent their property to Igbo people.
The Oba’s words were disturbing, but its context is even more disturbing:
The anti-Igbo rhetoric that has been part of the political discourse since the presidential election results. Accusatory and derogatory language – using words like ‘brainwashed,’ ‘tribalistic voting’ – has been used to describe President Jonathan’s overwhelming win in the southeast. All democracies have regions that vote in large numbers for one side, and even though parts of Northern Nigeria showed voting patterns similar to the Southeast, the opprobrium has been reserved for the Southeast.
But the rhetoric is about more than mere voting. It is really about citizenship. To be so entitled as to question the legitimacy of a people’s choice in a democratic election is not only a sign of disrespect but is also a questioning of the full citizenship of those people.
What does it mean to be a Nigerian citizen?
When Igbo people are urged to be ‘grateful’ for being in Lagos, do they somehow have less of a right as citizens to live where they live? Every Nigerian should be able to live in any part of Nigeria. The only expectation for a Nigerian citizen living in any part of Nigeria is to be law-abiding. Not to be ‘grateful.’ Not to be expected to pay back some sort of unspoken favour by toeing a particular political line. Nigerian citizens can vote for whomever they choose, and should never be expected to justify or apologize for their choice.
Only by feeling a collective sense of ownership of Nigeria can we start to forge a nation. A nation is an idea. Nigeria is still in progress. To make this a nation, we must collectively agree on what citizenship means: all Nigerians must matter equally.
Saturday, 11 April 2015
My take on the threat issued by the Oba of Lagos to the igbos
Wednesday, 18 February 2015
WHY AM TAKING A SWIFT FROM SUPPORTING GENERAL BUHARI
Just few hours ago, Obasanjo
endorsed General Buhari as the man to deliver
this nation. I was personally shocked, when I
heard the news. This is because, I was
expecting Baba to stay at the touch line, and
leave Nigerians to study his body language.
But the masquerade could not control his
dance in the public market. Hence he
mistakenly flogged his own mother who is also
a trader in the market. Nigerians, I am left
with no option than to tell us that, these ex-
generals and their boys are up to something.
The issue at hand is not all about the
presidential seat. But rather, the national cake
(oil blocks). Less I forget, is it not the same
Obasanjo who woke up and hand picked his
puppet 2011, who eventually grew like Joseph
the messiah of Egypt?
**Is it not the same Obj that told us 2011,
that General Buhari is too old to rule this
country?
**Is it not the same Obj that told us Buhari is
a dictator? Somebody should have a rethink
like me.
We must understand the preacher's language
before decoding his message. If Obj can take a
swift and prefer General Buhari to Jonathan, a
puppet he dedicated his energy and resources
to win 2011 election, then as an average
Nigerian, we should have a rethink and ask
our leaders what is so special in Aso Rock.
If leadership is to serve the people, why is it
that,the ex-generals finally gang up against
their new recruit on account of change? If
we're to outline the sins of Mr.President, are
the ex- generals not guilty of such sins? One
may ask why is SPEAKER taking a swift?
Everybody wants change. But I am astonished
the way and manner these ex- general joined
the train of change. Is it that, this is the first
time they heard the word change? If NO, why
did they not change this country when they
were given opportunity?
**Why advocating for change now when the
puppet body language shows he Will not
renew their oil blocks licence?
**Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet purchased equipment to monitor and
reduce vandalism?
*Why advocating for change now, when the
strong headed puppet wiped out their ghost
names from the civil service payroll?
**Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet sacked your boys as corrupt ministers?
**Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet refused to dump Sambo for another
puppet?
**Why advocating for change when he refused
to kill Nigerians indiscriminately.
But rather he is exploiting all means of
dialogue. Unlike your Odi brutal killings and
destruction. Why advocating for change now,
when the puppet refused to twist governors
hands with EFCC to pave his way like you did?
Why advocating for change now, when at 72
years, you still tell your children of 50years
they are the leaders of tomorrow?
Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet refused to give you the fertilizer deal?
Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet refused to jail your enemies?
Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet refused to rig election for your
daughter?
Why advocating for change now, when in your
time railways were not working?
Why advocating for change, when in your time,
our judiciary could not delivered a fair
judgement in favour of oppositions?
Baba, Nigerians are fed up of you sitting in
Otta, deciding their future. We want to decide
our destiny with the help of God. We want to
practice true democracy by using our votes to
decide our future. Let the good works or
antecedents of our leaders speak volume for
them. Just after the presidential chat with
Mr.President, we discovered that, you, your
colleagues and errant boys, are spreading
false informations to pave your way to aso
rock.
Lastly, I challenge you Baba, #Tinubu, #Atiku
and others to tell Nigerians that you don't
have oil blocks or you Generals are not
fighting the last battle to protect your oil
blocks.
They won't come out and speak my brothers
and sisters. They want us to believe they are
fighting for us. When they have their own local
refineries at their backyards. R..I.P Fela:
Animals wan dash me my human right!
endorsed General Buhari as the man to deliver
this nation. I was personally shocked, when I
heard the news. This is because, I was
expecting Baba to stay at the touch line, and
leave Nigerians to study his body language.
But the masquerade could not control his
dance in the public market. Hence he
mistakenly flogged his own mother who is also
a trader in the market. Nigerians, I am left
with no option than to tell us that, these ex-
generals and their boys are up to something.
The issue at hand is not all about the
presidential seat. But rather, the national cake
(oil blocks). Less I forget, is it not the same
Obasanjo who woke up and hand picked his
puppet 2011, who eventually grew like Joseph
the messiah of Egypt?
**Is it not the same Obj that told us 2011,
that General Buhari is too old to rule this
country?
**Is it not the same Obj that told us Buhari is
a dictator? Somebody should have a rethink
like me.
We must understand the preacher's language
before decoding his message. If Obj can take a
swift and prefer General Buhari to Jonathan, a
puppet he dedicated his energy and resources
to win 2011 election, then as an average
Nigerian, we should have a rethink and ask
our leaders what is so special in Aso Rock.
If leadership is to serve the people, why is it
that,the ex-generals finally gang up against
their new recruit on account of change? If
we're to outline the sins of Mr.President, are
the ex- generals not guilty of such sins? One
may ask why is SPEAKER taking a swift?
Everybody wants change. But I am astonished
the way and manner these ex- general joined
the train of change. Is it that, this is the first
time they heard the word change? If NO, why
did they not change this country when they
were given opportunity?
**Why advocating for change now when the
puppet body language shows he Will not
renew their oil blocks licence?
**Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet purchased equipment to monitor and
reduce vandalism?
*Why advocating for change now, when the
strong headed puppet wiped out their ghost
names from the civil service payroll?
**Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet sacked your boys as corrupt ministers?
**Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet refused to dump Sambo for another
puppet?
**Why advocating for change when he refused
to kill Nigerians indiscriminately.
But rather he is exploiting all means of
dialogue. Unlike your Odi brutal killings and
destruction. Why advocating for change now,
when the puppet refused to twist governors
hands with EFCC to pave his way like you did?
Why advocating for change now, when at 72
years, you still tell your children of 50years
they are the leaders of tomorrow?
Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet refused to give you the fertilizer deal?
Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet refused to jail your enemies?
Why advocating for change now, when the
puppet refused to rig election for your
daughter?
Why advocating for change now, when in your
time railways were not working?
Why advocating for change, when in your time,
our judiciary could not delivered a fair
judgement in favour of oppositions?
Baba, Nigerians are fed up of you sitting in
Otta, deciding their future. We want to decide
our destiny with the help of God. We want to
practice true democracy by using our votes to
decide our future. Let the good works or
antecedents of our leaders speak volume for
them. Just after the presidential chat with
Mr.President, we discovered that, you, your
colleagues and errant boys, are spreading
false informations to pave your way to aso
rock.
Lastly, I challenge you Baba, #Tinubu, #Atiku
and others to tell Nigerians that you don't
have oil blocks or you Generals are not
fighting the last battle to protect your oil
blocks.
They won't come out and speak my brothers
and sisters. They want us to believe they are
fighting for us. When they have their own local
refineries at their backyards. R..I.P Fela:
Animals wan dash me my human right!
Wednesday, 15 October 2014
DR. SIGN FIREMAN REPLIES SEYI RHODES, ALL THE HOT GIRLS FLYERS AND THE MURDER CASE IN JANUARY IN THIS MIND BLOWING INTERVIEW!! A MUST WATCH!
Friday, 10 October 2014
U.N. says thousands likely to be massacred if jihadist take Kobani
(Reuters) - Thousands of people most likely will be massacred if Kobani falls to Islamic State fighters, a U.N. envoy said on Friday, as militants fought deeper into the besieged Syrian Kurdish town in full view of Turkish tanks that have done nothing to intervene.
U.N. envoy Staffan de Mistura said Kobani could suffer the same fate as the Bosnian town of Srebrenica, where 8,000 Muslims were murdered by Serbs in 1995, Europe's worst atrocity since World War Two, while U.N. peacekeepers failed to protect them.
"If this falls, the 700, plus perhaps the 12,000 people, apart from the fighters, will be most likely massacred," de Mistura said. The United Nations believes 700 mainly elderly civilians are trapped in the town itself and 12,000 have left the center but not made it across the border into Turkey.
"Do you remember Srebrenica? We do. We never forgot and probably we never forgave ourselves," said de Mistura, the U.N. peace envoy for Syria. "When there is an imminent threat to civilians, we cannot, we should not, be silent."
The plight of mainly Kurdish Kobani has unleashed the worst street violence in years in Turkey, which has 15 million Kurds of its own. Turkish Kurds have risen up since Tuesday against President Tayyip Erdogan's government, which they accuse of allowing their kin to be slaughtered.
At least 33 people have been killed in three days of riots across the mainly Kurdish southeast, including two police officers shot dead in an apparent attempt to assassinate a police chief. The police chief was wounded.
Intense fighting between Islamic State fighters and outgunned Kurdish forces in the streets of Kobani could be heard from across the border. Warplanes roared overhead and the western edge of town was hit by an air strike, apparently by U.S.-led coalition jets.
But even as the United States has increased its bombing of Islamic State targets in the area, it has acknowledged that its air support is unlikely to be enough to save the city from falling.
'TRAGIC REALITY'
"Our focus in Syria is in degrading the capacity of (Islamic State) at its core to project power, to command itself, to sustain itself, to resource itself," U.S. Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken said. "The tragic reality is that in the course of doing that there are going to be places like Kobani where we may or may not be able to be effective."
Blinken said Islamic State controlled about 40 percent of Kobani. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which monitors the war, gave a similar estimate and said fighters had seized a central administrative area, known as the "security quarter".
Ocalan Iso, deputy head of the Kurdish forces defending the town, told Reuters that Islamic State fighters were still shelling the center, which proved it had not yet fallen.
"There are fierce clashes and they are bombing the center of Kobani from afar," he said, estimating the militants controlled 20 percent of the town. He called for more U.S.-led air strikes.
In Washington, the U.S. State Department said Turkey has agreed to support the training and equipping of moderate opposition groups in Syria and that a U.S. military planning team would visit Ankara next week to further discuss the matter. The United States has been pressing Turkey to join the fight against Islamic State.
The Middle East has been transformed in recent months by Islamic State, a Sunni militant group that has seized swathes of Syria and Iraq, crucifying and beheading prisoners and ordering non-Muslims and Shi'ites to convert or die.
The United States has been building a military coalition to fight the group, an effort that requires intervening in both Iraq and Syria, countries with complex multi-sided civil wars in which nearly every state in the region has allies and enemies.
International attention has focused on Turkey, a NATO member with the biggest army in the region, which has absorbed 1.2 million Syrian refugees, including 200,000 from Kobani in the last few weeks. Erdogan has so far refused to join the military coalition against Islamic State or use force to protect Kobani.
"We would like to appeal to the Turkish authorities ... to allow the flow of volunteers, at least, and their own equipment in order to be able to enter the city and contribute to a self-defense action," the U.N. envoy de Mistura said in Geneva.
'FIGHT TO LAST BREATH'
The Kurdish uprising in Turkey provoked a furious response from the Turkish government, which accuses Kurdish political leaders of using the situation in Kobani to destroy public order in Turkey and wreck its own delicate peace process.
Turkish Kurds fought a decades-long insurgency in which 40,000 people were killed. A truce last year has been one of the main achievements of Erdogan's decade in power, but Abdullah Ocalan, jailed co-founder of the Kurdish militant PKK, has said the peace process is doomed if Turkey permits Kobani to fall.
In a televised speech on Friday, Erdogan accused Kurdish leaders of "making calls for violence in a rotten way".
“I have put my hand, my body and my life into this peace process," he said. "And I will continue to fight until my last breath to restore the brotherhood of 77 million at any cost.”
The three days of riots in southern Turkey were the worst street violence in many years. The attempted assassination of a police chief in eastern Bingol province was the first incident of its kind since 2001. The armed wing of the PKK denied involvement in the attack.
The southeastern border province of Gaziantep saw some of the worst violence overnight, with four people killed and 20 wounded as armed clashes broke out between protesters calling for solidarity with Kobani and groups opposing them.
Footage showed crowds with guns, swords and sticks roaming streets of Gaziantep. Two local branches of the Kurdish People's Democratic Party (HDP), Turkey's main Kurdish party, there were torched, Dogan News Agency reported.
Many of Turkey's Kurds say the refusal to defend Kobani is proof the government sees them as a bigger enemy than Islamic State. At the frontier, dozens of Kurdish men watched Kobani's fighting from a hill where farmers once tended pistachio trees.
“I believed in the peace process, because I didn’t want any more children to die. But the Kurds were fooled. The peace process was insincere. The government either wants to wipe out Kurds or to enslave them," said Ahmet Encu, 46, who came 500 km (300 miles) to watch Kobani, where four relatives are fighting.
Turkey says it would join an international coalition to fight against Islamic State only if the alliance also confronts Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's government. Erdogan wants a no-fly zone to prevent Assad's planes from flying over the area near its border and a protected buffer zone there for refugees.
The United States has said it is studying the idea but has made clear it is not an option for now.
The Pentagon said the top U.S. military officer, General Martin Dempsey, will convene a meeting of more than 20 foreign defense chiefs next week outside Washington to discuss the multinational campaign against Islamic State.
(Additional reporting by Humeyra Pamuk, Jonny Hogg and Seda Sezer in Turkey, Oliver Holmes and Tom Perry in Beirut and Arshad Mohammed in Washington; Writing by Peter Graff and Will Dunham; Editing by Sophie Walker and Frances Kerry)
We welcome comments that advance the
story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a
comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it
to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the
comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our
comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (74)
Robert76 wrote:
The Western Powers will not be able
to stop ISIS until the people in the region wake up, join together, and
stamp out ISIS. Guess if they don’t want to get involved, they may
have to wake up some day to find ISIS taking over their countries also.
Abdulsayid wrote:
Robert76, I completely concur. All
of the ME needs to grow up and face this themselves. The US or the
“west” shouldn’t have to clean up after those who s**t in their own
backyard. And the ME will protest if we bomb or get totally involved and
they’ll protest if we don’t do anything. It’s a region of spoiled,
entitled, armed Islamic children. I know. I lived there.
Redford wrote:
Time to drop Turkey from NATO.
- U.N. says thousands likely to be massacred if jihadists take Kobani
| 1
- Fears grow in United States over Ebola's spread outside West Africa
| 2
- Pakistani teen, Indian activist win Nobel Peace Prize
| 3
- Growth worries slam stocks, oil, emerging markets
| 4
- New York man shot 15 minutes after release from prison
5
Pictures
Our Flagship financial information platform incorporating Reuters Insider
An ultra-low latency infrastructure for electronic trading and data distribution
A connected approach to governance, risk and compliance
Our next generation legal research platform
Our global tax workstation
Thomson Reuters is the world's largest international multimedia news agency, providing investing news, world news, business news, technology news, headline news, small business news, news alerts, personal finance, stock market, and mutual funds information available on Reuters.com, video, mobile, and interactive television platforms. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. Nasdaq delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.
NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. Nasdaq delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.
Tuesday, 16 September 2014
DR. SIGN FIREMAN HITS THE FRONT PAGE OF NEWS PAPERS IN AMERICA
DR FIREMAN HITS THE FRONT PAGE OF NEWS PAPERS IN AMERICA.. CLICK LINK TO SEE FOR YOURSELF~~~~~~~> http://www.natchezdemocrat.com/2014/09/16/viewfinder-global-evangelist-brings-healing-practices-to-natchez/
Monday, 13 January 2014
Cristiano Ronaldo wins Ballon d''or for the second time in his career
Cristiano Ronaldo wins World Footballer of the Year 2013
Crowd troops out of Dr.Sign Fireman's church on 12th of January 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)